<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>IPI PolicyBytes | Categorised Content</title><description>News, Notes, and Opinions From the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI)</description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:51:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<item><title>TechBytes 7.25: A Strategic Plan for IP Enforcement</title><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:08:23 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ This week Victoria Espinel, the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, submitted her long-anticipated <a href=http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/intellectualproperty/intellectualproperty_strategic_plan.pdf><span style="text-decoration:underline">2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement to the President and to Congress</span></a> (PDF, 65 pages). <br /> <br />Intellectual property (IP) has become a controversial topic in the past few years, but thankfully there was very little controversy in the Joint Strategic Plan. It seems that one of the few truly non-partisan policy issues today is the recognition of the importance of intellectual property protection to our nation&#8217;s economy. <br />]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.25-a-strategic-plan-for-ip-enforcement.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.25-a-strategic-plan-for-ip-enforcement.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.25-a-strategic-plan-for-ip-enforcement.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbytes-7.25-a-strategic-plan-for-ip-enforcement.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.25-a-strategic-plan-for-ip-enforcement.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>TechBytes 7.23: Speed Track</title><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:27:44 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ Last week the FCC released a report showing that 91 percent of US residents are pleased with their broadband connection speed, even if they do not know exactly what that speed is. In response, the FCC expressed bewilderment that this could be true, demanding that customers must know the speed so that they could carefully shop. <br /> <br />Really? <br /> <br />Can most people rattle off the horsepower of their car or their lawnmower? Can most people even tell you what &#8220;horsepower&#8221; means? (Horsepower is a measurement of work over time. Move 33,000 pounds one foot in a minute and that is one horsepower). What about their furnace? Can they opine on how many BTUs it produces? (BTU stands for British thermal unit. Heat one pound of 60 degree water by one degree at a pressure equal to one atmosphere and you have one BTU). <br /> <br />Most people can tell you whether their vehicle can pull their trailer effectively or accelerate fast enough when needed.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.23-speed-track.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Bartlett Cleland</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.23-speed-track.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.23-speed-track.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbytes-7.23-speed-track.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.23-speed-track.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>TechBytes 7.22: Why Should I Care about Piracy and Counterfeits?</title><pubDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:35:16 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ Piracy and Counterfeiting are back in the news again. <br /> <br />On piracy, there&#8217;s a new round of lawsuits against people who have been illegally sharing copyright-protected materials, although this time it&#8217;s movies, including the Oscar-winning film &#8220;The Hurt Locker.&#8221; <br /> <br />And on counterfeits, a cache of over seven million counterfeit pills, including counterfeit Viagra and other common prescription drugs, was just seized in Dubai, a central distribution port for destinations all over the world. <br /> <br />Two weeks ago, a Canadian man was arrested for selling counterfeit cancer medication through his Canadian Internet pharmacy website. <br /> <br />Oh, and the same guy was selling pirated business software. So he&#8217;s adept at both piracy AND counterfeiting. <br />]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.22-why-should-i-care-about-piracy-and-counterfeits.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.22-why-should-i-care-about-piracy-and-counterfeits.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.22-why-should-i-care-about-piracy-and-counterfeits.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbytes-7.22-why-should-i-care-about-piracy-and-counterfeits.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.22-why-should-i-care-about-piracy-and-counterfeits.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>Techbytes 7.21: Prove It!</title><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:44:42 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ Even casual observers of the FCC should have noticed by now that the policy actions it has taken in the last year, and the comments made by some of the commissioners, make clear that at least a couple extreme so-called &#8220;consumer groups&#8221; that routinely visit with FCC staff are leading commissioners in radical policy directions. <br /> <br />Obviously we are supporters of the First Amendment and are cheered when the public speaks up, telling government what they think. It&#8217;s all part of our right to petition the government, including regulatory agencies. However, we also think that government agencies need to especially consider data and substantive facts and information, rather than just policy pressure. <br /> <br />We&#8217;re concerned that these days the FCC seems to be in the thrall of one or two left-leaning groups and is following ideology rather than working from easily observable business and market reality.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.21-prove-it.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Bartlett Cleland</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.21-prove-it.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.21-prove-it.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbytes-7.21-prove-it.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.21-prove-it.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>Free Press doesn&#8217;t think the peoples&#8217; elected representatives should determine the nation&#8217;s policy</title><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 18:00:34 -0400</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://policybytes.org/Blog/PolicyBytes.nsf/dx/strong-bipartisan-opposition-to-fccs-attempt-to-regulate-the-internet.htm"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">I blogged the other day about bipartisan Congressional opposition to the FCC's attempt to expand their regulation of the Internet in the form of letters from 74 House Democrats and 37 Senate Republicans.</span></strong></a> <br /> <br /> Well, today, the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-28343-St-Louis-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m11d3-The-Free-Press--Robert-Chesney"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">radical leftwing group Free Press</span></strong></a> that is agitating for more government regulation of the Internet put up <a href="https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=459"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">a temper tantrum on their website.</span></strong></a> It musthave really knocked them for a loop to find out that not every Democrat on the Hill is smoking what Free Press is dealing.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/free-press-doesnt-think-the-peoples-elected-representatives-should-determine-the-nations-policy.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/free-press-doesnt-think-the-peoples-elected-representatives-should-determine-the-nations-policy.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/free-press-doesnt-think-the-peoples-elected-representatives-should-determine-the-nations-policy.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/free-press-doesnt-think-the-peoples-elected-representatives-should-determine-the-nations-policy.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/free-press-doesnt-think-the-peoples-elected-representatives-should-determine-the-nations-policy.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>Strong bipartisan opposition to FCC&#8217;s attempt to regulate the Internet</title><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:58:55 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ Those who think that the FCC's aggressive attempt to begin regulating the Internet is a partisan issue should take careful note of <a href="TitleII_FCC_24May2010.pdf/$file/TitleII_FCC_24May2010.pdf" title="a letter released today in which 73 elected Democratic Members of Congress oppose the FCC's actions. " target="_blank"/>a letter released today in which 73 elected Democratic Members of Congress oppose the FCC's actions. </a><br /> <br /> As the letter notes, <br /> <br /> <blockquote>We are writing to reinforce the strong bipartisan consensus among policymakers, industry participants, and analysts that the success of the broadband marketplace stems from policies that encourage competition, private investment, and legal certainty. The regulatory framework <em>first adopted in 1998 by the Clinton administration's FCC</em> has resulted in broadband industry infrastructure investment of approximately $60 billion per year.&#91;italics mine&#93; </blockquote> <br />]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/strong-bipartisan-opposition-to-fccs-attempt-to-regulate-the-internet.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/strong-bipartisan-opposition-to-fccs-attempt-to-regulate-the-internet.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/strong-bipartisan-opposition-to-fccs-attempt-to-regulate-the-internet.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/strong-bipartisan-opposition-to-fccs-attempt-to-regulate-the-internet.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/strong-bipartisan-opposition-to-fccs-attempt-to-regulate-the-internet.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>TechBytes 7.20: When Markets Change, Rules Should, Too</title><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:25:34 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ Recently the FCC decided it should examine the current &#8220;retransmission consent rules&#8221; to determine whether they are working for all parties, including broadcasters, content creators, service providers and customers. <br /> <br />Retransmission rules were adopted in 1992. They allowed US television stations to force video service providers, such as cable or satellite, to carry &#8220;local content&#8221; provided by the local television station (called &#8220;must carry&#8221;), or to negotiate with the video service provider for carriage of its broadcast programming. <br /> <br />But today, the rules need an update. Continuing the threat of &#8220;must carry&#8221; distorts price mechanisms and thus distorts negotiations&#8212;a short-sighted government construct rather than a true marketplace negotiation. <br />]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.20-when-markets-change-rules-should-too.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Bartlett Cleland</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.20-when-markets-change-rules-should-too.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.20-when-markets-change-rules-should-too.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbytes-7.20-when-markets-change-rules-should-too.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.20-when-markets-change-rules-should-too.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>TechBytes 7.19: All I Really Need To Know I Learned In Kindergarten</title><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:59:33 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ A few years ago there was a popular book entitled <em>All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten. </em>Watching the FCC&#8217;s reaction to losing the <em>Comcast </em>case, we&#8217;re beginning to wonder if maybe some higher-ups at the FCC weren&#8217;t paying attention in Kindergarten. <br /> <br /><strong>Don&#8217;t Throw a Tantrum</strong> <br />Perhaps you remember the days when being told &#8220;no&#8221; was really hard to handle. Sooner or later, for the most part, people learn that being told &#8220;no&#8221; is simply part of life and that &#8220;no&#8221; is far from the worst thing that can happen, and is actually often the catalyst to other opportunity. <br /> <br />Some, however, do not learn to handle &#8220;no&#8221; well.]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.19-all-i-really-need-to-know-i-learned-in-kindergarten.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Bartlett Cleland</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.19-all-i-really-need-to-know-i-learned-in-kindergarten.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.19-all-i-really-need-to-know-i-learned-in-kindergarten.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbytes-7.19-all-i-really-need-to-know-i-learned-in-kindergarten.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.19-all-i-really-need-to-know-i-learned-in-kindergarten.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>TechBytes 7.18: With Copps on the Beat</title><pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2010 14:16:08 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ The National Broadband Plan debate has given rise to claims that the FCC intends to go beyond its traditional regulatory mandate and begin to aggressively refashion the Internet in such a way as to achieve particular social ends. As a case in point, today the FCC announced that is going to assert sweeping authority to begin to subject broadband networks to an outdated, decades-old regulatory framework. <br /> <br />So how should one view the recent comments by one FCC commissioner who would be exercising these new and expanded powers, Commissioner Copps, when he addressed the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies? <br /> <br />Throughout his comments he bemoaned the fact that broadband is not yet available to every American (even though electricity and telephone took decades longer to reach the near ubiquity we have today).]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.18-copps-on-the-beat.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Bartlett Cleland</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.18-copps-on-the-beat.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.18-copps-on-the-beat.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbytes-7.18-copps-on-the-beat.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbytes-7.18-copps-on-the-beat.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>
<item><title>TechByte 7.12: The Real Thing</title><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:35:29 -0500</pubDate><description><![CDATA[ Having just watched highly controversial legislation become law along painfully partisan lines and cause political fractures that may last for years, it&#8217;s nostalgic to be reminded of the good old days when Congress acted less along partisan lines and more in the interests of the majority of the American people&#8212;like way, way back in 2008 when the House of Representatives passed the PRO-IP Act by a vote of 410 to 11, and the Senate passed it unanimously. <br /> <br />What kind of legislation passes with such a broad, bipartisan majority? Legislation that is designed to solve widely recognized problems in a way that makes sense to the American people. The PRO-IP Act was such a bill, designed to enhance intellectual property enforcement in order to protect the interests of those who work in the innovative and creative sectors of the U.S. economy, and the health and safety of all Americans. <br />]]></description><link>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbyte-7.12-the-real-thing.htm</link><dc:subject>Technology</dc:subject><dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator><comments>http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbyte-7.12-the-real-thing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbyte-7.12-the-real-thing.htm</guid><wfw:commentRss> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dxcomments/techbyte-7.12-the-real-thing.htm</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment> http://www.policybytes.org/blog/policybytes.nsf/dx/techbyte-7.12-the-real-thing.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment></item>

</channel></rss>
